Flash Task: Leaderboard Formula Feedback
Campaign on WhoTweets
WhoTweets
Status
Closed
Task Type
tweet
Points
200
Reputation
—
Special Rewards
—
Top submissions
Best entries from participants

alatiseayomide3
@alatiseayomide3 · 1.5K
145pts
- #2

Delight_0002
@Delight_251 · 2.8K
136pts
- #3

JennyJacob01
@jennyjacob01 · 5.5K
134pts
I’ve seen plenty of leaderboard formulas that look impressive at first, then become confusing the moment you try to understand them. This one from @TheDAOLabs gave me a different reaction. I looked at it twice, broke it down, and honestly nodded a little. Because for once, the logic feels clear and more importantly, fair. Quality Rate × Speed Efficiency × 1000 = Final Score Simple to read, but well thought out. Quality Rate is tied to how your comments are scored Amazing, Good, Suboptimal, or Rejected. In other words, the better and more consistent your contributions are, the healthier your score stays. Speed Efficiency tracks when you join a task. Early participation earns 300, mid entry earns 200, and later valid entries still earn 100. So timing matters, but late effort is not ignored. Now here’s the part I like most: These two numbers multiply instead of add. That changes everything. You can’t rush in early with weak comments and expect to stay on top. You also can’t deliver great comments every time while showing up late and expect the highest outcome. To really perform well, both sides need to work together. That feels like the right message. It also pushes a better rhythm. Instead of rewarding random bursts of activity, it favors steady effort. A few solid contributions each day can carry more weight than vanishing for days, then returning with a pile of rushed comments. Consistency builds momentum slowly, but it builds strong. Of course, no review system is perfect when people are involved. There may be times when a genuinely strong comment gets rated lower than it should, whether through oversight or different interpretation. If the team ever wants to improve an already solid system, adding a simple review option for clearly questionable ratings would help. Nothing heavy or dramatic — just a fair second look when something seems off. That would give contributors more confidence and make the process even stronger. Credit to @TheDAOLabs Team for creating something that rewards the habits that actually matter: quality work, good timing, and consistency over noise. That’s bigger than a leaderboard. Keep showing up. Keep adding value. Let the numbers sort themselves out.
The brief
Requirements
Open to all: Anyone meeting the criteria below can joinA new leaderboard formula is rolling out tomorrow on the marketplace — and we want your thoughts before it goes live.
This system balances quality + speed, rewarding miners who deliver strong content fast. Take a look at the formula and share your honest opinion: Is it fair? What would you improve? What stands out?
Your insights will help shape the future of DAO Labs leaderboard system.
Timeline: April 21–22, 2026 (24 hours only)
Instructions:
Review the given leaderboard formula
Share your honest feedback, insights, or suggestions
Post on X, tag @TheDAOLabs and use #SocialMining
Include the provided screenshot of the formula in your post
Submit your post link
Rewards:
Up to 200 points based on post quality, clarity, and reach
Requirements
Must have a minimum of 50 X/Twitter followers to be eligible for Social Mining Tasks. If you do not have a WhoTweets account yet, please register by clicking the button below.
April 21, 2026 at 1:26 PM → April 22, 2026 at 11:59 PM
This task has ended
Rewards have been distributed to 171 participants
Analytics
How this task performed
Participants
171
unique miners
Impressions
42.4K
across submissions
Articles
0
long-form entries
Likes
475
Retweets
493
Replies
112


